ASSIGNMENT
3: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
Crude
Solid Models and Refinement of Model Equations
Prologue:
September 8, 2018: Wendy Martinez, a 35-year-old female jogger was attacked and killed in Washington, DC. Mollie Tibbets, a 20-year-old female jogger, was attacked and killed in Brooklyn, IA and found dead on August 21, 2018. A 37-year-old female was attacked while running in Bridgewater, MA. She manages to fight off her attacker. A High School female student attacked in her own neighborhood while training for cross country. She managed to escape. May 2018: My own friend harassed to the point of running to my front door for help while on a training run. Luckily, I was home. This month: My neighbor returned home, after being followed for two blocks, while walking her dog. These are just the incidences that I know of from the beginning of the summer, not including my own experiences while training over the past ten years.
Problem Statement:
The device that I would like to drastically improve and design is the brass knuckles, otherwise known as knuckles, knuckle busters, or knuckle dusters. Current knuckles are mostly a one-size-fits-all design. They are bulky, heavy, and are difficult to tote around while being active. My version would be geared towards females, athletes in particular, who spend considerable amounts of time outdoors training, running, hiking, walking their dogs, or just enjoying nature. These individuals are very active and generally prefer to experience the outdoors solo. They have the desire to feel safe and the confidence to be able to defend themselves from an attacker. My design would be more ergonomic in that it would accommodate smaller hands. It would be made sleeker, lighter, remain durable, and become an extension of the hand. This device will not follow the ideology of “shrink it and pink it” that most women specific products consist of today. The updated design would be easy to use and house features that would inflict damage on an attacker in order to maximize the chance for escape and survival.
Female athletes and outdoor enthusiasts need to feel safe while being outside and doing the activities they love. When it comes to venturing out alone, the outside world is a completely different place for females than for males. Males don’t have to plan their routes dependent upon the amount of harassment they may encounter. They do not feel the need to include a male friend to tag along just so they can feel safe and complete their 5 hours of training in the mountains. They do not need to worry about whether or not what they wear will invite unnecessary comments from random people along the way. Female athletes want to do their work, have a good time while doing it, and return home safe like everyone else.
Assumptions:
The device should be:
- lightweight but super strong
- easy to put on and wear for an extended period of time
- comfortable enough to wear while being active
- be aesthetically pleasing (possible addition of jewelry-like features)
- strong yet discreet
- multifunctional (protective tool, bottle opener, key ring)
Pugh/Decision Matrix:
Weights % |
Evaluation Criteria |
Self Defense Device for Female Athletes |
|||||
Strategy 1: Elite |
Strategy 2: Active |
Strategy 3: Recreational |
|||||
Rating: |
Score: |
Rating: |
Score: |
Rating: |
Score: |
||
20% |
Light Weight Material |
5 |
1 |
4 |
0.8 |
3 |
0.6 |
20% |
High Strength |
5 |
1 |
4 |
0.8 |
4 |
0.8 |
20% |
Comfort |
5 |
1 |
4 |
0.8 |
3 |
0.6 |
15% |
Small Size |
5 |
0.75 |
4 |
0.6 |
3 |
0.45 |
10% |
Affordability |
3 |
0.3 |
4 |
0.4 |
5 |
0.5 |
5% |
Multifunctional |
1 |
0.05 |
2 |
0.1 |
3 |
0.15 |
10% |
Aesthetics |
4 |
0.4 |
4 |
0.4 |
4 |
0.4 |
100% |
Total: |
4.5 |
3.9 |
3.5 |
|||
Rating Scale: 5 = Excellent 4 = Very Good 3 = Good 2 = Fair 1 = Poor |
Justifications for Matrix:
The three key factors that are essential in the design of this device consist of light weight, high strength, and comfort. Without one, the device fails in overall effectiveness. Therefore, these three factors were weighted at 20% each of the overall weight of 100%. The idea of the device is to aid in creating force in a punch when defending oneself in a life or death situation. Therefore, the material selected must have a high strength-to-weight ratio in order to not only aid in creating force, but also withstand impact, while remaining comfortable to wear. Another characteristic in the design of this device is that it must become an extension of the hand, so the size is a key factor as well. Since the target market will be female athletes, the overall size of the device will be smaller, but extra care will be taken to create a range of sizes suitable for the ideal group of individuals who will be using it. Therefore, a weight of 15% was given to this criterion. Affordability was assigned a 10% weight. Affordability usually scores higher in other areas of consideration; however, it was decided that when it comes to life or death, affordability is not as essential. Stylishness is important to females. We care about the appearance of things, so aesthetics was assigned a value of 10% as well. The factor of multifunction was assigned the lowest value of 5% because the main focus of the device is to provide the function of protection, therefore any extra uses such as acting as a bottle opener or a keychain are not quite as important as the other criteria that were considered. Strategy 1 scored the highest in the decision matrix with the most important criteria scoring the highest values.
Multiple Solutions for Strategy 1:
Concept 1
[F]unction [R]equirements |
[D]esign [P]arameters |
[A]nalysis |
[R]esources |
[R]isk |
[C]ountermeasures |
Lightweight yet strong |
Incorporate titanium or aluminum alloy |
Evaluate each material’s strength-to-weight ratio, Hardness tests, stress-strain diagrams, biocompatible |
Manufacturing Systems Textbook, Machinery’s Handbook, Solids |
Titanium too costly, manufacturing titanium too costly, other metals too heavy |
Recyclable: find manufacturers that work with recycled titanium to reduce costs, Find larger manufacturers who may sell leftovers from larger projects at a lower cost, Survey what activities in particular this target market will be doing to determine if titanium is necessary |
Allow for comfort |
Contoured grip at inner edge, soften edges around the fingers for better fit |
Size, shape of female hands, mechanics of the hand in general |
Human anatomy, Actual people, Seeking opinions from female athletes, models of the hand |
Too many differing shapes and sizes, inability to narrow down ideal sizes, too costly to accommodate all sizes, custom fits |
Seek assistance from target market: take measurements from athletes and narrow down to three common sizes, do not offer custom fits or only offer custom fits as an add-on |
Accommodate 4 fingers (full fist) |
Remove bulk, soft smooth edges except at pointed tips |
Angles, rounded edges and relationship to strength |
Art and Design, Fashion and Style, Boxing, Martial Arts |
Softening design may compromise its purpose, Statics, Solids, Physics |
Must analyze force distributions and determine stresses device will experience, Research the mechanics of punching: what motion is most effective |
Affordability |
Maybe use a less expensive material that is still strong: Aluminum Alloy |
Research the budget of this target market, how much they would spend |
Demographics, Census, Outdoor Retailers & Sports Retailers
|
Retail cost may be too high, target market may not see importance of device |
Find most cost-effective manufacturers, Locate most affordable materials and labor, smart marketing practices |
Sketch 1:
[F]unction [R]equirements |
[D]esign [P]arameters |
[A]nalysis |
[R]esources |
[R]isk |
[C]ountermeasures |
Lightweight yet strong |
Materials: can use titanium or can use heavier material (aluminum, other alloys) |
Stress, strain, Creating maximum power, Evaluate each material’s strength-to-weight ratio, Hardness tests, stress-strain diagrams, biocompatible |
Manufacturing Systems Textbook, Statics, Solids, Machinery’s Handbook, Physics |
Costly if using titanium, Too heavy if not |
Survey what activities in particular this target market will be doing to determine if titanium is necessary, Recyclable: find manufacturers that work with recycled titanium to reduce costs, Find larger manufacturers who may sell leftovers from larger projects at a lower cost |
Allow for comfort |
Contoured grip at inner edge, soften edges around the fingers for better fit |
Size, shape of female hands, mechanics of the hand in general |
Human anatomy, Actual people, Seeking opinions from female athletes, models of the hand |
Too many differing shapes and sizes, inability to narrow down ideal sizes, too costly to accommodate all sizes, custom fits |
Seek assistance from target market: take measurements from athletes and narrow down to three common sizes, do not offer custom fits or only offer custom fits as an add-on |
Allow for small hands |
Smaller diameter finger holes, decreasing width of device |
Measure smaller hands, female hands, hands of target market |
Measurements with scale, calipers, molds of ideal hand size, Retail sizing references |
Too many sizes, too many different geometries |
Choose most common sizes, survey groups of athletes to collect data, Categorize into 3 main sizing options |
Effective damage at moment of impact |
Add spikes to outer face, add larger spike at fist end, provide better distribution of force to the wearer’s fingers |
Research motion of the arm when throwing a punch, forces involved in punching, what the hand absorbs when punching, how well does material work for this type of impact |
Physics, Human Anatomy, Body Mechanics, Statics, Solids, Manufacturing System Textbook, Machinery’s Handbook |
Device will be considered a weapon, may be illegal in some areas, could injure the wearer |
Research laws pertaining to carrying concealed weapons in areas, Only provide device to those who have license to carry, Strategically place spikes in areas that will not cause injury to wearer in case of a fall |
Allow for multifunction |
Incorporate keyring hole, bottle opener edge |
Determine how extra features will impact final design, will they impede? |
Opinion from public, referencing outdoor equipment & accessories |
Extra features add on weight and bulk, may take value away from main purpose of device |
Stick to small features, keep design simple, focus on ultimate goal of device, eliminate multifunction all together |
Sketch 2:
[F]unction [R]equirements |
[D]esign [P]arameters |
[A]nalysis |
[R]esources |
[R]isk |
[C]ountermeasures |
Lightweight yet strong |
Use of titanium as material |
High strength-to-weight ratio, biocompatible, corrosion resistant, Hardness tests, stress-strain diagrams, biocompatible, recyclable |
Manufacturing Systems Textbook, Machinery’s Handbook |
High cost of materials, High cost of manufacturing |
Recyclable: find manufacturers that work with recycled titanium to reduce costs, Find larger manufacturers who may sell leftovers from larger projects at a lower cost, Survey what activities in particular this target market will be doing to determine if titanium is necessary |
Allow for comfort |
Incorporate contoured palm grip (interior edge), soften edges around the fingers for better fit |
Size, shape of female hands, mechanics of the hand in general, biocompatible so will not cause allergic reactions |
Human anatomy, Actual people, Seeking opinions from female athletes, models of the hand |
Too many differing shapes and sizes, inability to narrow down ideal sizes, too costly to accommodate all sizes, custom fits |
Seek assistance from target market: take measurements from athletes and narrow down to three common sizes, do not offer custom fits or only offer custom fits as an add-on |
Minimalist design |
2-finger device instead of all 4 fingers, remove bulk |
Stress-strain analysis, minimalist design research, jewelry resources |
Art & Design, jewelry design, current trends, Solids |
Removing bulk may weaken device, will require increased machining, target market may not like minimalist design |
Seek feedback from target market pertaining to preferred design styles, Find areas of device that need the most strength |
Proper size range |
Focus on smaller hand size but also design a range of sizes |
Analyze common sizes of different categories of people, age categories, activity categories |
Observation at races, outdoor events, sports events, consulting retail experts |
Small sizes too small, large sizes too large…exclusion of wide range of sizes |
Provide a few different sizes that would accommodate everyone, Offer custom fits |
Aesthetically pleasing yet functional |
Spikes along outer edge, Larger side spike at end, incorporate features of jewelry (stones, skulls, etc.) |
Limitations of titanium and adding colors |
Retail Industry, Manufacturing Systems Textbook, Current fashion & trends, jewelry design |
Added features means more labor, more labor means higher cost of manufacturing |
Locate low cost manufacturing, Utilize scraps from other manufacturers |
Equations that May Apply:
Force: |
Energy Transfer: |
Impulse: |
F= ma For a 130lb person, the arm & fist is about 5.25% of total weight: m = 3.096 kg (assuming): t = 0.1 s v = 10 m/s a = 100 m/s^2
F = (3.096)(100) F = 309.6 N
|
KE = (1/2)mv^2
Mass (fist & arm) = 2-4kg Velocity = 10-15m/s^2
KE = (1/2)(2)(10^2) KE = 100 J
KE = (1/2)(4)(15^2) KE = 450 J
KE = 100 - 450 J
|
J = Ft
Force = 310 N Time = 0.1 s
J = (310)(0.1) J = 31 Ns
|
Stress (fist): |
Stress (device): |
Momentum: |
Stress = F/A
Stress = 310/.04 Stress = 7750 Pa |
For a pointed tip, surface area decreases significantly. Reduction in surface area will result in increase in Stress.
Stress = 310/.01 Stress = 31000 Pa
Stress = 310/.005 Stress = 62000 Pa |
P = mv
Mass = 4 kg Avg. velocity (fist) = 11 m/s
P = 44 kg m/s |
Lessons Learned:
Begin early (analyzing each aspect is very time consuming)
Keep things simple
Physics behind boxing, punching (impulse, momentum, collisions, energy)
Importance of pressure, time, and energy transfer in punching
History of brass knuckles
Evolution of brass knuckles within the fashion industry
Legal aspects associated with devices considered weapons
Contours of the hand, formation of the fist
Activities Date and Time:
10/5/2018: 3:15pm – 5:30pm: Research physics behind punching & brass knuckles
10/6/2018: 1:00pm – 7:00pm: Decision Matrix, Multiple Solutions, Gantt Chart
10/7/2018: 10:50am – 12:30pm: Gantt Chart, Concept development, Sketches, Lessons Learned
4:30pm – 6:30pm: FRDPARRC Tables, Equations
10/8/2018: 2:00pm – 3:00pm: Equations, Sketches
10/9/2018: 10am – 12pm: Equations, Sketches
4:20pm – 6:00pm: Concept sketches
10/10/2018: 7:00pm – 9:30pm: Comments Advisees, Final Updates, Update Website
Comments to Advisees:
Lucas Shevlin:
Bradley Darnell: