-------------------------------------------------------------- --- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair --- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then --- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded --- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as --- you want. --- When filling out the review form please mind --- the following rules: --- (1) Lines starting with --- are comments. EasyChair will --- ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with --- --- as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the --- review form or remove them --- (2) Lines starting with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not --- remove or modify these lines. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW FORM ID: 198372::85058 *** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 38 *** TITLE: DAFT: Disk Geometry-Aware File System Traversal *** AUTHORS: Fanglu Guo and Tzi-cker Chiueh --- CATEGORY: Regular Paper *** PC MEMBER: Jim Conrad -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW: --- Please provide a detailed review, including justification for --- your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless --- the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE: --- If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write --- them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC --- meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is --- optional. -------------------------------------------------------------- --- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a --- reviewer different from the PC member in charge, add --- information about the reviewer in the form below. Do not --- modify the lines starting with *** *** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line) -------------------------------------------------------------- --- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your --- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the --- irrelevant lines *** OVERALL EVALUATION: --- 3 (strong accept) --- 2 (accept) --- 1 (weak accept) --- 0 (borderline paper) --- -1 (weak reject) --- -2 (reject) --- -3 (strong reject) *** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: --- 4 (expert) --- 3 (high) --- 2 (medium) --- 1 (low) --- 0 (null) *** ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** TECHNICAL MERIT: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** PRESENTATION AND READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** RELEVANCE TO MASCOTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** END -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair --- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then --- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded --- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as --- you want. --- When filling out the review form please mind --- the following rules: --- (1) Lines starting with --- are comments. EasyChair will --- ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with --- --- as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the --- review form or remove them --- (2) Lines starting with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not --- remove or modify these lines. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW FORM ID: 199079::85058 *** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 57 *** TITLE: On Learning based Address Mapping for improving the Performance of Memory Subsystems in MPSoCs *** AUTHORS: Pratyush Kumar and Madhav Desai --- CATEGORY: Regular Paper *** PC MEMBER: Jim Conrad -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW: --- Please provide a detailed review, including justification for --- your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless --- the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE: --- If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write --- them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC --- meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is --- optional. -------------------------------------------------------------- --- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a --- reviewer different from the PC member in charge, add --- information about the reviewer in the form below. Do not --- modify the lines starting with *** *** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line) -------------------------------------------------------------- --- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your --- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the --- irrelevant lines *** OVERALL EVALUATION: --- 3 (strong accept) --- 2 (accept) --- 1 (weak accept) --- 0 (borderline paper) --- -1 (weak reject) --- -2 (reject) --- -3 (strong reject) *** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: --- 4 (expert) --- 3 (high) --- 2 (medium) --- 1 (low) --- 0 (null) *** ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** TECHNICAL MERIT: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** PRESENTATION AND READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** RELEVANCE TO MASCOTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** END -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair --- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then --- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded --- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as --- you want. --- When filling out the review form please mind --- the following rules: --- (1) Lines starting with --- are comments. EasyChair will --- ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with --- --- as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the --- review form or remove them --- (2) Lines starting with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not --- remove or modify these lines. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW FORM ID: 199334::85058 *** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 81 *** TITLE: Analysis of Web 2.0 workloads and a workload generation tool *** AUTHORS: Amit Kumar Yadav, Mayank Aggarwal, Amitabha Bagchi, Anirban Mahanti, Thirumale Niranjan and Sai Susarla --- CATEGORY: Regular Paper *** PC MEMBER: Jim Conrad -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW: --- Please provide a detailed review, including justification for --- your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless --- the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE: --- If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write --- them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC --- meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is --- optional. -------------------------------------------------------------- --- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a --- reviewer different from the PC member in charge, add --- information about the reviewer in the form below. Do not --- modify the lines starting with *** *** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line) -------------------------------------------------------------- --- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your --- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the --- irrelevant lines *** OVERALL EVALUATION: --- 3 (strong accept) --- 2 (accept) --- 1 (weak accept) --- 0 (borderline paper) --- -1 (weak reject) --- -2 (reject) --- -3 (strong reject) *** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: --- 4 (expert) --- 3 (high) --- 2 (medium) --- 1 (low) --- 0 (null) *** ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** TECHNICAL MERIT: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** PRESENTATION AND READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** RELEVANCE TO MASCOTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** END -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair --- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then --- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded --- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as --- you want. --- When filling out the review form please mind --- the following rules: --- (1) Lines starting with --- are comments. EasyChair will --- ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with --- --- as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the --- review form or remove them --- (2) Lines starting with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not --- remove or modify these lines. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW FORM ID: 199501::85058 *** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 101 *** TITLE: Parallelized Critical Path Search in Electrical Circuit Designs *** AUTHORS: Pascal Bolzhauser, Anthony Sulistio, Gerhard Angst and Christoph Reich --- CATEGORY: Regular Paper *** PC MEMBER: Jim Conrad -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW: --- Please provide a detailed review, including justification for --- your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless --- the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE: --- If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write --- them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC --- meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is --- optional. -------------------------------------------------------------- --- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a --- reviewer different from the PC member in charge, add --- information about the reviewer in the form below. Do not --- modify the lines starting with *** *** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line) -------------------------------------------------------------- --- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your --- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the --- irrelevant lines *** OVERALL EVALUATION: --- 3 (strong accept) --- 2 (accept) --- 1 (weak accept) --- 0 (borderline paper) --- -1 (weak reject) --- -2 (reject) --- -3 (strong reject) *** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: --- 4 (expert) --- 3 (high) --- 2 (medium) --- 1 (low) --- 0 (null) *** ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** TECHNICAL MERIT: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** PRESENTATION AND READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** RELEVANCE TO MASCOTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** END -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair --- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then --- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded --- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as --- you want. --- When filling out the review form please mind --- the following rules: --- (1) Lines starting with --- are comments. EasyChair will --- ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with --- --- as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the --- review form or remove them --- (2) Lines starting with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not --- remove or modify these lines. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW FORM ID: 199538::85058 *** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 106 *** TITLE: Mobility Analysis of Dynamic Markovian Agents for the study of collision risk in Road Tunnels *** AUTHORS: Davide Cerotti, Marco Gribaudo and andrea bobbio --- CATEGORY: Regular Paper *** PC MEMBER: Jim Conrad -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW: --- Please provide a detailed review, including justification for --- your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless --- the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE: --- If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write --- them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC --- meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is --- optional. -------------------------------------------------------------- --- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a --- reviewer different from the PC member in charge, add --- information about the reviewer in the form below. Do not --- modify the lines starting with *** *** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line) -------------------------------------------------------------- --- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your --- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the --- irrelevant lines *** OVERALL EVALUATION: --- 3 (strong accept) --- 2 (accept) --- 1 (weak accept) --- 0 (borderline paper) --- -1 (weak reject) --- -2 (reject) --- -3 (strong reject) *** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: --- 4 (expert) --- 3 (high) --- 2 (medium) --- 1 (low) --- 0 (null) *** ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** TECHNICAL MERIT: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** PRESENTATION AND READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** RELEVANCE TO MASCOTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** END -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair --- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then --- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded --- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as --- you want. --- When filling out the review form please mind --- the following rules: --- (1) Lines starting with --- are comments. EasyChair will --- ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with --- --- as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the --- review form or remove them --- (2) Lines starting with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not --- remove or modify these lines. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW FORM ID: 199579::85058 *** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 111 *** TITLE: A Sensitivity Analysis of a New Hardware-Supported Global Synchronization Unit *** AUTHORS: Elizabeth Lynch and George Riley --- CATEGORY: Regular Paper *** PC MEMBER: Jim Conrad -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW: --- Please provide a detailed review, including justification for --- your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless --- the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE: --- If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write --- them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC --- meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is --- optional. -------------------------------------------------------------- --- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a --- reviewer different from the PC member in charge, add --- information about the reviewer in the form below. Do not --- modify the lines starting with *** *** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line) -------------------------------------------------------------- --- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your --- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the --- irrelevant lines *** OVERALL EVALUATION: --- 3 (strong accept) --- 2 (accept) --- 1 (weak accept) --- 0 (borderline paper) --- -1 (weak reject) --- -2 (reject) --- -3 (strong reject) *** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: --- 4 (expert) --- 3 (high) --- 2 (medium) --- 1 (low) --- 0 (null) *** ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** TECHNICAL MERIT: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** PRESENTATION AND READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** RELEVANCE TO MASCOTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** END -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair --- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then --- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded --- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as --- you want. --- When filling out the review form please mind --- the following rules: --- (1) Lines starting with --- are comments. EasyChair will --- ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with --- --- as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the --- review form or remove them --- (2) Lines starting with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not --- remove or modify these lines. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW FORM ID: 199599::85058 *** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 114 *** TITLE: A Holistic, Architecture-Driven Approach to Performance Analysis *** AUTHORS: Frank Brüseke, Gregor Engels, Christian Bajer and Robert Klemme --- CATEGORY: Regular Paper *** PC MEMBER: Jim Conrad -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW: --- Please provide a detailed review, including justification for --- your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless --- the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE: --- If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write --- them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC --- meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is --- optional. -------------------------------------------------------------- --- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a --- reviewer different from the PC member in charge, add --- information about the reviewer in the form below. Do not --- modify the lines starting with *** *** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line) -------------------------------------------------------------- --- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your --- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the --- irrelevant lines *** OVERALL EVALUATION: --- 3 (strong accept) --- 2 (accept) --- 1 (weak accept) --- 0 (borderline paper) --- -1 (weak reject) --- -2 (reject) --- -3 (strong reject) *** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: --- 4 (expert) --- 3 (high) --- 2 (medium) --- 1 (low) --- 0 (null) *** ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** TECHNICAL MERIT: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** PRESENTATION AND READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** RELEVANCE TO MASCOTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** END -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair --- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then --- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded --- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as --- you want. --- When filling out the review form please mind --- the following rules: --- (1) Lines starting with --- are comments. EasyChair will --- ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with --- --- as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the --- review form or remove them --- (2) Lines starting with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not --- remove or modify these lines. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW FORM ID: 199691::85058 *** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 128 *** TITLE: Enhancing and Optimizing a Data Protection Solution *** AUTHORS: Ludmila Cherkasova, Roger Lau, Harald Burose and Bernhard Kappler --- CATEGORY: Regular Paper *** PC MEMBER: Jim Conrad -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW: --- Please provide a detailed review, including justification for --- your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless --- the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE: --- If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write --- them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC --- meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is --- optional. -------------------------------------------------------------- --- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a --- reviewer different from the PC member in charge, add --- information about the reviewer in the form below. Do not --- modify the lines starting with *** *** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line) -------------------------------------------------------------- --- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your --- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the --- irrelevant lines *** OVERALL EVALUATION: --- 3 (strong accept) --- 2 (accept) --- 1 (weak accept) --- 0 (borderline paper) --- -1 (weak reject) --- -2 (reject) --- -3 (strong reject) *** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: --- 4 (expert) --- 3 (high) --- 2 (medium) --- 1 (low) --- 0 (null) *** ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** TECHNICAL MERIT: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** PRESENTATION AND READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** RELEVANCE TO MASCOTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** END -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair --- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then --- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded --- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as --- you want. --- When filling out the review form please mind --- the following rules: --- (1) Lines starting with --- are comments. EasyChair will --- ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with --- --- as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the --- review form or remove them --- (2) Lines starting with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not --- remove or modify these lines. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW FORM ID: 199794::85058 *** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 145 *** TITLE: Finding a Simple Path with Multiple Must-include Nodes *** AUTHORS: Hars Vardhan, Wanjun Huang, Miguel Razo, Shreejith Billenahalli, Arularasi Sivasankaran, Limin Tang, Marco Tacca, Andrea Fumagalli and Paolo Monti --- CATEGORY: Regular Paper *** PC MEMBER: Jim Conrad -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW: --- Please provide a detailed review, including justification for --- your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless --- the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE: --- If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write --- them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC --- meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is --- optional. -------------------------------------------------------------- --- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a --- reviewer different from the PC member in charge, add --- information about the reviewer in the form below. Do not --- modify the lines starting with *** *** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line) -------------------------------------------------------------- --- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your --- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the --- irrelevant lines *** OVERALL EVALUATION: --- 3 (strong accept) --- 2 (accept) --- 1 (weak accept) --- 0 (borderline paper) --- -1 (weak reject) --- -2 (reject) --- -3 (strong reject) *** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: --- 4 (expert) --- 3 (high) --- 2 (medium) --- 1 (low) --- 0 (null) *** ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** TECHNICAL MERIT: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** PRESENTATION AND READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** RELEVANCE TO MASCOTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** END -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair --- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then --- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded --- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as --- you want. --- When filling out the review form please mind --- the following rules: --- (1) Lines starting with --- are comments. EasyChair will --- ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with --- --- as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the --- review form or remove them --- (2) Lines starting with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not --- remove or modify these lines. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW FORM ID: 203983::85058 *** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 197 *** TITLE: Benchmarking Memory Management Capabilities Inside ROOT-Sim *** AUTHORS: Roberto Vitali, Alessandro Pellegrini and Francesco Quaglia --- CATEGORY: Regular Paper *** PC MEMBER: Jim Conrad -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW: --- Please provide a detailed review, including justification for --- your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless --- the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE: --- If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write --- them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC --- meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is --- optional. -------------------------------------------------------------- --- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a --- reviewer different from the PC member in charge, add --- information about the reviewer in the form below. Do not --- modify the lines starting with *** *** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line) -------------------------------------------------------------- --- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your --- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the --- irrelevant lines *** OVERALL EVALUATION: --- 3 (strong accept) --- 2 (accept) --- 1 (weak accept) --- 0 (borderline paper) --- -1 (weak reject) --- -2 (reject) --- -3 (strong reject) *** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: --- 4 (expert) --- 3 (high) --- 2 (medium) --- 1 (low) --- 0 (null) *** ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** TECHNICAL MERIT: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** PRESENTATION AND READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** RELEVANCE TO MASCOTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** END -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair --- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then --- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded --- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as --- you want. --- When filling out the review form please mind --- the following rules: --- (1) Lines starting with --- are comments. EasyChair will --- ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with --- --- as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the --- review form or remove them --- (2) Lines starting with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not --- remove or modify these lines. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW FORM ID: 204426::85058 *** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 207 *** TITLE: Planning Data Transfers in Grids: A Multi-Service Queueing Approach *** AUTHORS: Kashif Munir, Renato Lo Cigno and Michael Welzl --- CATEGORY: Regular Paper *** PC MEMBER: Jim Conrad -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW: --- Please provide a detailed review, including justification for --- your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless --- the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE: --- If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write --- them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC --- meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is --- optional. -------------------------------------------------------------- --- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a --- reviewer different from the PC member in charge, add --- information about the reviewer in the form below. Do not --- modify the lines starting with *** *** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line) -------------------------------------------------------------- --- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your --- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the --- irrelevant lines *** OVERALL EVALUATION: --- 3 (strong accept) --- 2 (accept) --- 1 (weak accept) --- 0 (borderline paper) --- -1 (weak reject) --- -2 (reject) --- -3 (strong reject) *** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: --- 4 (expert) --- 3 (high) --- 2 (medium) --- 1 (low) --- 0 (null) *** ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** TECHNICAL MERIT: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** PRESENTATION AND READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** RELEVANCE TO MASCOTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** END -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- --- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair --- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then --- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded --- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as --- you want. --- When filling out the review form please mind --- the following rules: --- (1) Lines starting with --- are comments. EasyChair will --- ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with --- --- as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the --- review form or remove them --- (2) Lines starting with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not --- remove or modify these lines. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW FORM ID: 208387::85058 *** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 211 *** TITLE: Design of future Software Defined Radio (SDR) for All-IP Heterogeneous Network *** AUTHORS: Md. Zahangir Alam Ripon, Charles Chittaranjan Patra Patra, Colin Patra Colin and M Abdus Sobhan Sobhan --- CATEGORY: Regular Paper *** PC MEMBER: Jim Conrad -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REVIEW: --- Please provide a detailed review, including justification for --- your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless --- the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required. -------------------------------------------------------------- *** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE: --- If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write --- them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC --- meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is --- optional. -------------------------------------------------------------- --- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a --- reviewer different from the PC member in charge, add --- information about the reviewer in the form below. Do not --- modify the lines starting with *** *** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line) *** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line) -------------------------------------------------------------- --- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your --- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the --- irrelevant lines *** OVERALL EVALUATION: --- 3 (strong accept) --- 2 (accept) --- 1 (weak accept) --- 0 (borderline paper) --- -1 (weak reject) --- -2 (reject) --- -3 (strong reject) *** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: --- 4 (expert) --- 3 (high) --- 2 (medium) --- 1 (low) --- 0 (null) *** ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** TECHNICAL MERIT: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** PRESENTATION AND READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** RELEVANCE TO MASCOTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) --- 5 (excellent) --- 4 (good) --- 3 (fair) --- 2 (poor) --- 1 (very poor) *** END --------------------------------------------------------------